Print this page Email this page Users Online: 410 | Click here to view old website
Home About us Editorial Board Search Current Issue Archives Submit Article Author Instructions Contact Us Login 
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 207-222

Accreditation of Undergraduate Medical Training Programs: Practices in Nine Developing Countries as Compared with the United States

1 De La Salle University College of Medicine, Dasmarinas, Cavite, Philippines
2 University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
3 University of Malaya Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
4 University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria
5 University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
6 Aga Khan Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
7 College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
8 Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
9 Seth GS Medical College, Mumbai, India
10 National Medical University, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
11 National University of Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
12 University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa
13 FAIMER Institute, Philadelphia, USA
14 ECFMG, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence Address:
Jose Cueto
Department of Surgery, De La Salle University Medical Center, DLSU-Health Sciences Campus, Dasmarinas 4114 Cavite
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Context and objectives: Undergraduate medical training program accreditation is practiced in many countries, but information from developing countries is sparse. We compared medical training program accreditation systems in nine developing countries, and compared these with accreditation practices in the United States of America (USA). Methods: Medical program accreditation practices in nine developing countries were systematically analyzed using all available published documents. Findings were compared to USA accreditation practices. Findings: Accreditation systems with explicitly defined criteria, standards and procedures exist in all nine countries studied: Argentina, India, Kenya, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines and South Africa. Introduction of accreditation processes is relatively recent, starting in 1957 in India to 2001 in Malaysia. Accrediting agencies were set up in these countries predominantly by their respective governments as a result of legislation and acts of Parliament, involving Ministries of Education and Health. As in the USA, accreditation: (1) serves as a quality assurance mechanism promoting professional and public confidence in the quality of medical education, (2) assists medical schools in attaining desired standards, and (3) ensures that graduates' performance complies with national norms. All nine countries follow similar accreditation procedures. Where mandatory accreditation is practiced, non-compliant institutions may be placed on probation, student enrollment suspended or accreditation withdrawn. Conclusion: Accreditation systems in several developing countries are similar to those in the developed world. Data suggest the trend towards instituting quality assurance mechanisms in medical education is spreading to some developing countries, although generalization to other areas of the world is difficult to ascertain.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded146    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal